June 22, 2009TV to marathonI recently posted about television shows I intend to watch for the first time. But how about some shows that are so good I want to watch them again, marathon style? I’ve got a bunch. In fact, I have already started a marathon of Middle Man with my wife and a couple of friends. It is a glorious show that should not be in the grey floaty ether of cancelation/hiatus that it is. Based on a comic book, this show is pitch perfect. You know how some people complained that the film version of Watchmen was too close to the original as to offer nothing new? And how some people said the same of Sin City? Well, Middle Man is nearly like that, except the acting and the new stories add so much more to the franchise. The episodes taken from issues of the comic are almost panel for panel the same. Then there are completely original episodes that fit in seamlessly, making for a great adaptation. This is how it should be done. The back and forth is so good that the un-filmed final episode is being released as a comic! Plus the fact that Natalie Morales is really hot doesn’t hurt anything.
Related Groups:
Buzznet Originals, Watchers United
Posted on 06/22/2009 4:51 PM Comments (3)
June 18, 2009Some genres defy categorization.
I’m currently working on a personal project: to rip and organize all of my music to make it easily accessible. Not only am I talking about “artistalbumtrack” format but also accurate tagging. At first I thought it was going to be the album art that would be the trouble but between Media Monkey, Tag & Rename and Songbird I’ve got a pretty smooth work flow down. No, it’s the simple “genre” tag that’s getting me down.
The problem is that genres, after existing for some time, become obsolete. I realized this when I finished giving everything currently ripped a basic genre. Other than a few tricky artists (I’m looking at you, Bowie) it was fairly simply. But looking at my collection afterward I saw something shocking: most of my music was in a very few number of genres. Mainly “pop” and “indie”. In fact, that’s the incredible majority of my collection right there. And the reason for that is these genres are no longer accurate descriptors for the music.
Pop is the most obvious. When “pop” was first used it wasn’t so much a genre as a market or even an industry. You had classical, jazz, maybe country and pop. Popular music. But then everything people talked about was pop so pop had to be subdivided. Today the genre “pop” is actually a sub-genre of the original pop which makes it all the more confusing. But pop was spun off into the sub-genre pop with the advent of “alternative” as a genre. It was originally an alternative to mainstream pop. So then there was poppop and popalternative. But in the 90s almost everything turned to popalternative. So then we end up with things like indie. Indie used to stand for independent and was used to describe unsigned bands. You could have indiepunk, indiepop, indiecountry, etc. But pretty soon that became inaccurate as well. Indie itself became a genre instead of a market description so popindie was born.
This means that indiepop is a very different sounding genre than popindie. The first is an unsigned pop band while the latter is a signed (and most likely expensively produced) indie band. The difference becomes more pronounced the deeper the sub-genre is before it’s appropriated into standard pop. Take “emo” for instance. Originally emo would have mapped (pop or indie)punkhardcoreemo. That would be a band like anything from Glassjaw to At The Drive-In. That band sounds nothing like popemo which would be something more akin to Fall Out Boy or My Chemical Romance.
It looks like with a constantly shifting music system the only classification that will keep working is one based on context, hence the full lineage system of “genresub-genresub-sub-genreetc…”. However, since I can’t work that into current ID3 tags I’m stuck. Now the question is how far to subdivide the single genre tag I’m given. And that I am still unsure of.
So how do you cut up your music collections, in terms of storage and classification? Related Groups:
Buzznet Originals
Posted on 06/18/2009 2:29 PM Comments (3)
|
ARCHIVE
MY FRIENDS
Buzznet's Official New Age Amazon
PanasonicYouth rockinponda Nessi with an I breesays pompasaurus Seb ™★★★ peterismyplaymate unsceneunheard huldaholm and she was Luna Lovegood FOLLOWERS ALL FRIENDS |


